LawyerRatingz.com

Find, rate and review Lawyers and Attorneys



Moosa Jiwaji lawyer reviews

Add a picture of this lawyer Save this listing Search again
Moosa Jiwaji
Lawyer
Practice Area:  Divorce / Family Law
Firm:  Settleassist
Profile updated: 5/10/19    Submit profile update

average quality
Rating: 3.0 (1-5) based on 2 reviews.

Lawyer Moosa Jiwaji has a fair overall rating on LawyerRatingz.com.


The following postings have not been substantiated by LawyerRatingz.com.

Submit a news article about this lawyer Rate this lawyer

KEY Date

 K 

 n 

 o 

 w 

 l 

 e 

 d 

 g 

 e 

 C 

 o 

 m 

 m 

 u 

 n 

 i 

 c 

 a 

 t 

 i 

 o 

 n 

 T 

 e 

 n 

 a 

 c 

 i 

 t 

 y 

 W 

 o 

 r 

 k 

   

 Q 

 u 

 a 

 l 

 i 

 t 

 y 

 V 

 a 

 l 

 u 

 e 

Comments
 
Click to report rating    4/28/25   5     5     5     5     5   Moosa Jiwaji 1949-2025 - Moosa was well regarded by so many in the legal profession. He passed away on Easter Monday and leaves a legacy of service to others. Those of us who knew him were the richer for that. RID: 272906
Click to report rating    1/24/25   1     1     1     1     1   I cannot recommend hiring him as a court representative for any legal matters. My husband hired Moosa in 11/23 to create a detailed parenting plan, ensure that his children could remain in their current school, and have his ex, Michelle Elliott, cover her share of the daycare costs for their two children. Unfortunately, this case proceeded all the way to trial, where he appeared unprepared. He failed to make a single objection, despite my husband urging him to do so, and did not challenge any of the evidence presented by Crystal Lawrence, Michelle's lawyer, even when false statements were made. For instance, a cropped text message was introduced as evidence, while the complete message was available in a binder prepared beforehand, yet he chose not to question it.The very 1st document that was filed was done so incorrectly. She also presented a highly redacted email from the children’s daycare and when her lawyer asked why they are only addressed to her? She claimed because she is the RID: 271985
Rate this lawyer